Like everything in life, venturing online dosen't come without dangers. From potential online predators to inappropriate content, these dangers are out there and your students can come in contact with one or more of them at some stage in their online experiences. However this shouldn't have any impact on whether students are provided with the opportunity to use technology within the classroom. Football brings with it the possibility for on field bullying and injuries. Although dangers are associated with the sport, it is taught and watched by children throughout the country, therefore why should something like technology be treated any differently. One of the most problematic issue associated with technology is how students portray themselves and are perceived by others online. This is often highlighted in the media through inappropriate use of social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace and is further exaggerated through the ignorance of users on these sites. Incorporating lessons into the curriculum which detail the need for students to accurately represent themselves and to be wary of the information that they put in the digital arena is the first in creating safe and conscious digital users.
Many teachers believe they are limited in how much they can control their students online operations. First of all that's an incorrect statement in itself, controlling students online operations makes for a very behaviorist and limited learning environment. Teachers controlling their students online then gives them someone or something (the system) to rebel against. It is instead about exploring this technology together that will build a true foundation for using this digital environment. By giving the students responsibilities, rather than restricting them, trust can therefore be established. As much as many will argue students aren't all trustworthy, if you don't give them the benefit of the doubt in the first place, how will you ever know and how will they ever grow.
In turn schools have provided filtering systems that disable sites in attempts to prevent wondering eyes or potential online predators. These barriers that are put in place can be easily broken thanks to the introduction of tunnel websites that bypass these filters. So if the student is technological knowledgeable, and lets face it these days there is a growing amount of digital experts entering schools, the filters are merely a momentary challenge that they will no doubt overcome. Essentially it's about relationships with students and learning together about these online dangers. Creating technology guidelines together is a great way of involving the students in the process and alerting them to the dangers out there, as simply being aware will create a much more digitally conscious user.
"You have to deal with the behavior, not the technology" (Johnstone, 2006:34)
“We haven’t fundamentally restructured the way our schools function. We need to stop, take a step back, and ask ourselves some hard questions about the tenets that define our work today. We need to rethink some basic assumptions about the use of time, the structure of the school day, and how we organize our students in their learning environment. We need to move from measuring seat time to measuring competency
Together, we have an unprecedented chance to reform our schools and drive innovation; a fantastic nexus of crisis, urgency, and opportunity. We must dramatically improve teaching and learning, personalize instruction, and ensure that the educational
environments we offer to all students keep pace with the 21st century.
We can get there with technology.”
United States Secretary of Education Arne Duncan
I completely agree with your analogy to football. We let children play sports so they can learn by doing and develop their skills, despite the potential risks. We wouldn't expect someone who has never been able to play a game to be capable the second they are let out into the real world. Why are the dangers associated with the internet any different?
ReplyDeleteIf we stretch our minds back to our classes in literacy last year, the gradual release of responsibility model is great to apply to internet use. As teachers we can slowly release the controls we have over our student's internet use as they develop their skills in cybersafety.
I agree with Liz that the football analogy is a good one. While students need guidance beforehand, and probably some limits when they first play, the only way they'll learn and develop their skills (and gain an appreciation for the risks and dangers) is by actually playing real games.
ReplyDeleteAt the beginning, then, there needs to be lots of supervision and guidance, but as with the gradual release of responsibility model mentioned by Liz, educators should be able to gradually withdraw as students start to take responsibility for their own safety online.
By the time students finish school, they need to be able to use the internet effectively and safely by themselves.